By
Tonya M. Evans-Walls, Esquire
© 2005
Tonya M. Evans-Walls. All rights reserved.
Request
permission to reprint this article
The Hershey
Corporation sought an injunction against Simon & Schuster in
federal court to prevent the mega publishing house from using
Hershey-owned images to market "Hershey: Milton S. Hershey's
Extraordinary Life of Wealth, Empire and Utopian Dreams," which
is set to be released in January 2006.
The 305-page book, by New York writer Michael D'Antonio, recounts the
life of Milton Hershey, who founded and built the company to its
superstar status in the candy world. Hershey used his fortune to
create a substantial trust to educate and care for the medical needs
of children.
According to the lawsuit, ""Hershey does not object to the
content of defendant's book, or to the mere use of the word 'Hershey'
in the title of the book, ... [h]owever, defendant has designed and
adopted a dust jacket for the book which extensively uses Hershey's
well-known marks and trade dress beyond any manner permissible under law."
Generally the plaintiff in a trademark action must prove that the
defendant's use of plaintiff's mark has created a
"likelihood-of-confusion" about the origin of the
defendant's goods or services. There are basically two types of
affirmative defense to trademark infringement: fair use or parody.
Only time will tell if Simon & Schuster's use is fair use since
the company would probably not proceed on a parody argument as the
book appears to be autobiographical rather than comedic in nature.
DEC 28, 2005: This case settled out of court when Simon &
Schuster agreed to print a disclaimer on the book cover stating that
the Hershey Corp. did not endorse the book.